War News is Bad News

Idly scanning the local newspaper this morning, I came across three blurbs from the Associated Press regarding America's ever growing foreign military engagements.

1.  It seems that the U.S. is performing military "exercises" with a nuclear-powered war ship off the coast of North Korea.  South Korea is participating in these exercises with the U.S.  This action seems to be in response to the North Korean attack in March that sank a South Korean warship, killing 46 sailors.  North Korea is evidently "enraged" by these actions.  North Korea attacked a warship from South Korea, so America sends in the Navy?  What the hell is going on?  Why is this our fight?  And does it make sense to be enraging the incredibly unstable dictator of that nation, who happens to have in his possession nuclear warheads?

2.  Former chief of the CIA Michael Hayden is now saying that a military strike against Iran "seems inexorable" due to the fact that Tehran keeps pushing ahead with its suspected nuclear program.  The fact of the matter is that Iran is a very poor country with an incredibly weak military.  And why is it that we and our friends the Russians get to have nuclear weapons when other countries can't?  Surely it can't be the benevolent record our two countries have around the world. America is the bully on the playground who goes around beating up little kids.  Does it make sense to invade yet another Middle Eastern country?  How has that worked for us thus far?  I also wonder if Iran's proximity to our friend - their rival - Israel has anything to do with this supposedly unavoidable attack.  But the drum of war with Iran has been beating in Washington for a long time now, so what should we expect?

3.  A U.S. drone fired missiles at two houses, killing 12 "militants" in Pakistan.  In the past two years, there have been more than a hundred of these unmanned drone attacks in Pakistan carried out by the U.S.  These are most insidious and counter-productive for a couple of reasons.  Time and again it turns out that the intelligence was wrong and that the house was filled with women and children!  This new information from WikiLeaks tells that story.   U.S. missiles are blowing up houses full of innocent people!  If that makes you and me this mad, imagine how pissed the Pakistani people must be?  These are bombs coming basically from space with absolutely no warning and no possible chance of immediate retaliation.  Talk about terrorist recruitment!  Let's make it easier for the Taliban and Al-Qaeda!  And our government and people continue to be dumbfounded as to why anyone would possibly want to attack America.

It's a good thing that everyone voted for change and hope.  That's really paying off, eh?

Cartoonin

This is a very brief and nerdy summation of the dubious fiat currency system that somehow works on religious type faith in this country.  YOUR DOLLAR IS NOT WORTH A DOLLAR!!!

Political Opposites Team Up!

Congressman Barney Frank (D) of Massachusetts and Congressman Ron Paul (R) of Texas have teamed up and are calling for an immense cut in military spending by the United States.  Paul and Frank say that by eliminating most of the unnecessary military bases and troop presences around the world (all over Europe, Japan, South Korea, etc. etc.), the government could save and estimated one trillion dollars! 

This development is of particular interest to me, in part because of the somewhat unholy alliance between two congressmen whose political and economic philosophies are quite different from one another. Frank is a supporter of government intervention into the economy, while Paul is a proponent of the Austrian School of Economics and truly free-market-based solutions. (Note that this isn't the first time that Rep. Paul has joined forces with a congressman from the "opposite" end of the political spectrum: See my post, Audit the Fed Bill Gutted!, for more about Paul's work with Sen. Bernie Sanders.)

This unusual collaboration speaks to the priority of the issue. Both men understand plainly that the American empire is vastly over-extended and that if there is not a concerted effort to reign in the beast, it will, like all empires throughout history, collapse. 

In the following clip from CNN, Wolf Blitzer (what a great football name!) interviews the two of them on this issue. It is a good interview as a whole (it is in two parts), but I really like (at 4:44) the way Frank responds to the ignorant claim being made that if we pull out of Afghanistan, we will just allow the terrorists to gain strength and establish training grounds: He is in agreement with Ron Paul in asserting that even if we were able to gain complete control of Afghanistan, the terrorists would simply relocate to Yemen, Sudan, Somalia, etc. I love when Frank says he wishes "nuclear submarines could defeat terrorism, because we have all of the nuclear submarines, and we would have beat it." Unfortunately, it doesn't work like that. 

The strategic significance of such a momentous shift in US foreign policy goes beyond the vast - and obvious - initial economic savings. If we pull out of all of these countries, we inherently make ourselves less vulnerable to terror attacks: For one, we would suddenly give unstable regions and impoverished populations less of a reason to hate us so much, making recruiting harder for terrorists; and second, we would have much more money available to invest in a legitimate national defense.
 

This recent proposal highlights yet another difference between Ron Paul and everyone else.  Let's see one of the "intellectual" leaders of the Tea Party movement team up with an openly gay socialist from Taxachussetts for the express purpose of ending war!  Hell yeah, Ron Paul!

Make sure to look at 4:44 if you can't watch the entire interview.

Drug Laws Debunked!

Complete drug decriminalization/legalization is a topic I have already posted about but want to revisit because it is one of the more counter-intuitive and controversial conversations. I am of the opinion that all drugs should be legal; if you, me or your cousin wants heroin, we should be able to go to the drug store and buy it. That we should be able to does not mean that we should, and it is the heinous nature of drug abuse that makes legalization so counter-intuitive for the majority of us.  I want to be clear that by advocating for drug decriminalization, I am in no way condoning drug use.

"Legalize all drugs? You must be crazy!" you are saying.  "Drug use will skyrocket and the streets will be consumed by twitched out addicts desperately searching for another fix."  Well, as you might expect, I have found a few videos that prove the opposite, with clear empirical evidence.

Drugs of all varieties were decriminalized in the country of Portugal eight years ago, and the results have been pretty definitive. 

In this first one by the BBC news (hmm... sounds legitimate), I think one of the most crucial points is that since drug legalization, the number of people being treated for heroin addiction has risen. When there is absolutely no fear of jail, I think drug addicts are more likely to seek treatment because their condition is seen as a medical issue, not a criminal offense.



In this fantastic interview from Reason.tv with Glenn Greenwald of Salon.com, Greenwald raises several key points and provides viewers with a libertarian argument for natural rights.  His assessment of Portugal's severe drug problem in the nineties is particularly revealing; the more the Portuguese government criminalized drugs, the more usage increased.





It will be interesting to see if the California ballot measure regarding the complete decriminalization of marijuana will pass this fall.  If it does, I think we will start to see many more states fall in line: Increased tax revenues and less "crime" in California - the criminal justice system and prisons are a huge money suck! - would bring about a kind of market response as people pushed for similar results in their own states. Individual states have the right to nullify overreaching federal law.( Nullification of bad laws is a subject I will explore in future posts.)

For the throngs of readers who have been desperately seeking a new post, I apologize for the delay.  The two of you can get back to reading.

Interested In?

If you like some of what you have read here, look into the work of Murray N. Rothbard.   He was prolific!  Here is a nice article about him.